<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Pavlov Scope Comments</title>
	<link>http://blog.freyguy.com</link>
	<description>Using worth with liberty, awareness is the human curse.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 09:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Proxy Auto-Detect (IE and Firefox) by: Direct Connection or auto detect?</title>
		<link>http://blog.freyguy.com/archives/2006/03/01/proxy-auto-detect-ie-and-firefox/#comment-578</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 13:00:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.freyguy.com/archives/2006/03/01/proxy-auto-detect-ie-and-firefox/#comment-578</guid>
					<description>[...] Auto detect Proxy Settings and Direct connection to Internet. Also there is a bit of both in the last article.    __________________ &amp;#34;If you can't make it good, make it LOOK good.&amp;#34; - B Gates [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] Auto detect Proxy Settings and Direct connection to Internet. Also there is a bit of both in the last article.    <i></i>______________ &quot;If you can&#8217;t make it good, make it <span class="caps">LOOK</span> good.&quot; &#8211; B Gates [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Copyright (C) Kevin Frey 1993-2008 by: &#187; KevFrey - My Current LastFM playlist -&#62; Pavlov Scope</title>
		<link>http://blog.freyguy.com/copyright-c-kevin-frey-1993-2008/#comment-573</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Nov 2007 18:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.freyguy.com/copyright-c-kevin-frey-1993-2008/#comment-573</guid>
					<description>[...] Frank Lloyd Wright    Copyright 2007-KevFrey [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] Frank Lloyd Wright    Copyright 2007-KevFrey [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Proxy Auto-Detect (IE and Firefox) by: &#187; Proxy Auto-Detect (IE and Firefox) -&#62; Pavlov Scope</title>
		<link>http://blog.freyguy.com/archives/2006/03/01/proxy-auto-detect-ie-and-firefox/#comment-546</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Sep 2007 02:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.freyguy.com/archives/2006/03/01/proxy-auto-detect-ie-and-firefox/#comment-546</guid>
					<description>[...] Proxy Auto-Detect (IE and Firefox) Filed under: IT &amp;#8212; FreyGuy @ 2:26:31 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] Proxy Auto-Detect (IE and Firefox) Filed under: <span class="caps">IT </span>&#8212; FreyGuy @ 2:26:31 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Copyright (C) Kevin Frey 1993-2006 by: &#187; DST 2007 (Daylight Savings Time - 2007 Updates) -&#62; Pavlov Scope</title>
		<link>http://blog.freyguy.com/copyright-c-kevin-frey-1993-2006/#comment-133</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 01:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.freyguy.com/copyright-c-kevin-frey-1993-2006/#comment-133</guid>
					<description>[...] PagesCopyright (C) Kevin Frey 1993-2006 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] PagesCopyright&#169; Kevin Frey 1993-2006 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Copyright (C) Kevin Frey 1993-2008 by: &#187; DST 2007 (Daylight Savings Time - 2007 Updates) -&#62; Pavlov Scope</title>
		<link>http://blog.freyguy.com/copyright-c-kevin-frey-1993-2008/#comment-132</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Feb 2007 01:31:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.freyguy.com/copyright-c-kevin-frey-1993-2008/#comment-132</guid>
					<description>[...] Click here for Microsoft&amp;#8217;s full page of information of all DST2007-related changes required. For you Exchange and Outlook types, pay specific attention since updating the underlying OS is not enough.Click here for Sun&amp;#8217;s Java updates and information affecting Java programmers, users of Java-based applications, etc.    Have fun and enjoy the Daylight.  _____________________________________________________________ KevFrey kevfrey@gmail.com . . . . . .. . . . . .  &amp;#34;I believe in God, only I spell it Nature.&amp;#34; - Frank Lloyd Wright Copyright 2007-KevFrey [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] Click here for Microsoft&#8217;s full page of information of all <span class="caps">DST2007</span>-related changes required. For you Exchange and Outlook types, pay specific attention since updating the underlying OS is not enough.Click here for Sun&#8217;s Java updates and information affecting Java programmers, users of Java-based applications, etc.    Have fun and enjoy the Daylight.  <i></i>_________________________________________________________ KevFrey <a href="mailto:kevfrey@gmail.com">kevfrey@gmail.com</a> . . . . . .. . . . . .  &quot;I believe in God, only I spell it Nature.&quot; &#8211; Frank Lloyd Wright Copyright 2007-KevFrey [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Copyright (C) Kevin Frey 1993-2006 by: &#187; Spam Trends and Statistics - 2006-10 (October) -&#62; Pavlov Scope</title>
		<link>http://blog.freyguy.com/copyright-c-kevin-frey-1993-2006/#comment-74</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.freyguy.com/copyright-c-kevin-frey-1993-2006/#comment-74</guid>
					<description>[...] Note: graph modified from original &amp;#8211; Thanks to TQM3  for the continued research and service to the community Anti-spam vendor Postini  reports that nearly 80% of all email on the Internet is from known compromised systems hosting spam, while a more in-depth content analysis by multiple vendors has shown that less than 4% of all Internet email is legitimate email. This means that in practice, 96% of all email is junk mail of some kind which is staggering. While this may seem dubious at first, note the following per-day averages culled from my company&amp;#8217;s own anti-spam server logs: Average per-day incoming Internet mail stats:  Note that we block outright 97.5% of all email received, and when combined with quarantined mail, this increases to 98.3%.This percentage means the mail that reaches my users&amp;#8217; inboxes without any user action, on average, represents less than 2% of all the attempted delivered email. If we were to eliminate spam filtering, users could expect 50-70 more spam messages per-day / per-user on average, adding up to email being &amp;#34;lost in the shuffle&amp;#34; creating productivity loss, massive increase in resource utilization on email servers, and a lot of angry internal customers ;-)Another interesting stat above &amp;#8211; on average, we only receive 6 viruses-infected email messages per day out of 55,000+... a rounding error in raw number terms. This indicates the larger and irrefutable trend that email is no longer used as a conduit for spreading viruses as was once the case; rather it is being used to make money from spamming, phishing, identity theft, and other forms of organized crime. Note: The caveat to this statistic is that our anti-spam server drops traffic from known spammer IP addresses and subnets, prior to the virus scanner analyzing the message. It could be that there are many more virus-infected email messages being dropped before virus analysis if those virus-infected messages come from known spammer IPs.The massive up-tick in spam generated and sustained since 2006-June has created a &amp;#34;law of big numbers&amp;#34; problem that is allowing a higher raw number volume of spam through that would have otherwise been blocked pre-June 2006. Botnets are the primary cause of this effect and are the single biggest threat on the Internet at-large today.Sidebar: For those not familiar with the term, botnets  are the result of a coordinated installation of a certain type of malicious software designed in such a way as to allow surreptitious and central control of many computers. After compiling the control of these computers (sometimes number in the tens or hundreds of thousands), hackers can use them to perform coordinated attacks against other systems, gather and amalgamate information on large numbers of people (for identity fraud, etc.), and are largely used in organized cybercrime today. The client computers that have this software installed are called &amp;#34;bots&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;zombies&amp;#34; since control of their operation has been seized by the hacker and they are no longer autonomous. The &amp;#34;net&amp;#34; part is the fact that they are operating as a distributed network of computing resources &amp;#8211; thus, botnet_____________________________________________________________ KevFrey kevfrey@gmail.com . . . . . .. . . . . .&amp;#34;24-hour banking; I don&amp;#8217;t have time for that&amp;#34;- Stephen WrightCopyright 2006-Kevin Frey [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] Note: graph modified from original &#8211; Thanks to <span class="caps">TQM3 </span> for the continued research and service to the community Anti-spam vendor Postini  reports that nearly 80% of all email on the Internet is from known compromised systems hosting spam, while a more in-depth content analysis by multiple vendors has shown that less than 4% of all Internet email is legitimate email. This means that in practice, 96% of all email is junk mail of some kind which is staggering. While this may seem dubious at first, note the following per-day averages culled from my company&#8217;s own anti-spam server logs: Average per-day incoming Internet mail stats:  Note that we block outright 97.5% of all email received, and when combined with quarantined mail, this increases to 98.3%.This percentage means the mail that reaches my users&#8217; inboxes without any user action, on average, represents less than 2% of all the attempted delivered email. If we were to eliminate spam filtering, users could expect 50-70 more spam messages per-day / per-user on average, adding up to email being &quot;lost in the shuffle&quot; creating productivity loss, massive increase in resource utilization on email servers, and a lot of angry internal customers ;-)Another interesting stat above &#8211; on average, we only receive 6 viruses-infected email messages per day out of 55,000+... a rounding error in raw number terms. This indicates the larger and irrefutable trend that email is no longer used as a conduit for spreading viruses as was once the case; rather it is being used to make money from spamming, phishing, identity theft, and other forms of organized crime. Note: The caveat to this statistic is that our anti-spam server drops traffic from known spammer IP addresses and subnets, prior to the virus scanner analyzing the message. It could be that there are many more virus-infected email messages being dropped before virus analysis if those virus-infected messages come from known spammer IPs.The massive up-tick in spam generated and sustained since 2006-June has created a &quot;law of big numbers&quot; problem that is allowing a higher raw number volume of spam through that would have otherwise been blocked pre-June 2006. Botnets are the primary cause of this effect and are the single biggest threat on the Internet at-large today.Sidebar: For those not familiar with the term, botnets  are the result of a coordinated installation of a certain type of malicious software designed in such a way as to allow surreptitious and central control of many computers. After compiling the control of these computers (sometimes number in the tens or hundreds of thousands), hackers can use them to perform coordinated attacks against other systems, gather and amalgamate information on large numbers of people (for identity fraud, etc.), and are largely used in organized cybercrime today. The client computers that have this software installed are called &quot;bots&quot; or &quot;zombies&quot; since control of their operation has been seized by the hacker and they are no longer autonomous. The &quot;net&quot; part is the fact that they are operating as a distributed network of computing resources &#8211; thus, botnet_____________________________________________________________ KevFrey <a href="mailto:kevfrey@gmail.com">kevfrey@gmail.com</a> . . . . . .. . . . . .&quot;24-hour banking; I don&#8217;t have time for that&quot;- Stephen WrightCopyright 2006-Kevin Frey [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Copyright (C) Kevin Frey 1993-2006 by: &#187; Firefox flaw allows password compromise -&#62; Pavlov Scope</title>
		<link>http://blog.freyguy.com/copyright-c-kevin-frey-1993-2006/#comment-73</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Nov 2006 17:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.freyguy.com/copyright-c-kevin-frey-1993-2006/#comment-73</guid>
					<description>[...] Note: graph modified from original &amp;#8211; Thanks to TQM3  for the continued research and service to the community Anti-spam vendor Postini  reports that nearly 80% of all email on the Internet is from known compromised systems hosting spam, while a more in-depth content analysis by multiple vendors has shown that less than 4% of all Internet email is legitimate email. This means that in practice, 96% of all email is junk mail of some kind which is staggering. While this may seem dubious at first, note the following per-day averages culled from my company&amp;#8217;s own anti-spam server logs: Average per-day incoming Internet mail stats:  Note that we block outright 97.5% of all email received, and when combined with quarantined mail, this increases to 98.3%.This percentage means the mail that reaches my users&amp;#8217; inboxes without any user action, on average, represents less than 2% of all the attempted delivered email. If we were to eliminate spam filtering, users could expect 50-70 more spam messages per-day / per-user on average, adding up to email being &amp;#34;lost in the shuffle&amp;#34; creating productivity loss, massive increase in resource utilization on email servers, and a lot of angry internal customers ;-)Another interesting stat above &amp;#8211; on average, we only receive 6 viruses-infected email messages per day out of 55,000+... a rounding error in raw number terms. This indicates the larger and irrefutable trend that email is no longer used as a conduit for spreading viruses as was once the case; rather it is being used to make money from spamming, phishing, identity theft, and other forms of organized crime. Note: The caveat to this statistic is that our anti-spam server drops traffic from known spammer IP addresses and subnets, prior to the virus scanner analyzing the message. It could be that there are many more virus-infected email messages being dropped before virus analysis if those virus-infected messages come from known spammer IPs.The massive up-tick in spam generated and sustained since 2006-June has created a &amp;#34;law of big numbers&amp;#34; problem that is allowing a higher raw number volume of spam through that would have otherwise been blocked pre-June 2006. Botnets are the primary cause of this effect and are the single biggest threat on the Internet at-large today.Sidebar: For those not familiar with the term, botnets  are the result of a coordinated installation of a certain type of malicious software designed in such a way as to allow surreptitious and central control of many computers. After compiling the control of these computers (sometimes number in the tens or hundreds of thousands), hackers can use them to perform coordinated attacks against other systems, gather and amalgamate information on large numbers of people (for identity fraud, etc.), and are largely used in organized cybercrime today. The client computers that have this software installed are called &amp;#34;bots&amp;#34; or &amp;#34;zombies&amp;#34; since control of their operation has been seized by the hacker and they are no longer autonomous. The &amp;#34;net&amp;#34; part is the fact that they are operating as a distributed network of computing resources &amp;#8211; thus, botnet_____________________________________________________________ KevFrey kevfrey@gmail.com . . . . . .. . . . . .&amp;#34;24-hour banking; I don&amp;#8217;t have time for that&amp;#34;- Stephen WrightCopyright 2006-Kevin Frey [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[...] Note: graph modified from original &#8211; Thanks to <span class="caps">TQM3 </span> for the continued research and service to the community Anti-spam vendor Postini  reports that nearly 80% of all email on the Internet is from known compromised systems hosting spam, while a more in-depth content analysis by multiple vendors has shown that less than 4% of all Internet email is legitimate email. This means that in practice, 96% of all email is junk mail of some kind which is staggering. While this may seem dubious at first, note the following per-day averages culled from my company&#8217;s own anti-spam server logs: Average per-day incoming Internet mail stats:  Note that we block outright 97.5% of all email received, and when combined with quarantined mail, this increases to 98.3%.This percentage means the mail that reaches my users&#8217; inboxes without any user action, on average, represents less than 2% of all the attempted delivered email. If we were to eliminate spam filtering, users could expect 50-70 more spam messages per-day / per-user on average, adding up to email being &quot;lost in the shuffle&quot; creating productivity loss, massive increase in resource utilization on email servers, and a lot of angry internal customers ;-)Another interesting stat above &#8211; on average, we only receive 6 viruses-infected email messages per day out of 55,000+... a rounding error in raw number terms. This indicates the larger and irrefutable trend that email is no longer used as a conduit for spreading viruses as was once the case; rather it is being used to make money from spamming, phishing, identity theft, and other forms of organized crime. Note: The caveat to this statistic is that our anti-spam server drops traffic from known spammer IP addresses and subnets, prior to the virus scanner analyzing the message. It could be that there are many more virus-infected email messages being dropped before virus analysis if those virus-infected messages come from known spammer IPs.The massive up-tick in spam generated and sustained since 2006-June has created a &quot;law of big numbers&quot; problem that is allowing a higher raw number volume of spam through that would have otherwise been blocked pre-June 2006. Botnets are the primary cause of this effect and are the single biggest threat on the Internet at-large today.Sidebar: For those not familiar with the term, botnets  are the result of a coordinated installation of a certain type of malicious software designed in such a way as to allow surreptitious and central control of many computers. After compiling the control of these computers (sometimes number in the tens or hundreds of thousands), hackers can use them to perform coordinated attacks against other systems, gather and amalgamate information on large numbers of people (for identity fraud, etc.), and are largely used in organized cybercrime today. The client computers that have this software installed are called &quot;bots&quot; or &quot;zombies&quot; since control of their operation has been seized by the hacker and they are no longer autonomous. The &quot;net&quot; part is the fact that they are operating as a distributed network of computing resources &#8211; thus, botnet_____________________________________________________________ KevFrey <a href="mailto:kevfrey@gmail.com">kevfrey@gmail.com</a> . . . . . .. . . . . .&quot;24-hour banking; I don&#8217;t have time for that&quot;- Stephen WrightCopyright 2006-Kevin Frey [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Copyright (C) Kevin Frey 1993-2006 by: Pavlov Scope</title>
		<link>http://blog.freyguy.com/copyright-c-kevin-frey-1993-2006/#comment-70</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.freyguy.com/copyright-c-kevin-frey-1993-2006/#comment-70</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Windows Update - A serious bug - Windows 2000 users take note.. &lt;/strong&gt;

 SecurityNo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>Windows Update &#8211; A serious bug &#8211; Windows 2000 users take note.. </strong></p>
	<p> SecurityNo
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Copyright (C) Kevin Frey 1993-2006 by: Pavlov Scope</title>
		<link>http://blog.freyguy.com/copyright-c-kevin-frey-1993-2006/#comment-69</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 04:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.freyguy.com/copyright-c-kevin-frey-1993-2006/#comment-69</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;0day - VML flaw in Internet Explorer&lt;/strong&gt;

 Another pr</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>0day &#8211; <span class="caps">VML</span> flaw in Internet Explorer</strong></p>
	<p> Another pr
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on Copyright (C) Kevin Frey 1993-2006 by: Pavlov Scope</title>
		<link>http://blog.freyguy.com/copyright-c-kevin-frey-1993-2006/#comment-67</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:34:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blog.freyguy.com/copyright-c-kevin-frey-1993-2006/#comment-67</guid>
					<description>&lt;strong&gt;Patch Tuesday - September&lt;/strong&gt;


Hi all - 

Microsof</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><strong>Patch Tuesday &#8211; September</strong></p>
	<p>Hi all &#8211;<br />
Microsof</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
